| |
|
| |
Issue No. 08/04/09 |
|
June / 2009 |
|
|
|
| A Word With You |
| Kannada Chalanachitra Academy |
It is gratifying to note that the present Karnataka Government has taken a step forward with regard to formation of Kannada Chalanachitra Academy, a step which was pending for implementation for a long time after the recommendation made by V.N.Subba Rao committee in its report on State Film Policy.
The Academy has many laudable objectives and it needs a systematic approach on the part of this newly constituted body to implement it in a meaningful way. It should be noted that as the name itself suggests its activities are more academic in nature and definitely not a body that is created to find panacea for all the ills of the Kannada film industry.
It merits importance to recall here the exuberance with which we welcomed the formation of Karnataka Film Industry Development Corporation several years back when it was formed. Its objective was purely to address all the problems of the Film Industry. It is not known now what role it has so far played and what its present form of existence is.
The first film enquiry committee headed by S.K.Patil in its report, in 1951, strongly recommended formation of a Film Council (Similar to Academy) to develop a healthy film culture in the country. Though most of the recommendations like Starting Film Institute, Institution of Awards, conducting Film Festival, formation of FFC(NFDC), starting Children Film Society etc were implemented, this major recommendation of Film Council never got the attention of the Central Government in spite of repeated appeals made by the Federation of Film Societies of India and many other eminent film personalities. This was a major lapse because today we do not have a Film Akademy like other Akademies at the Centre to supervise and guide the film industry to develop a healthy film culture in the country. This would have also helped better coordination with the State Acadmies in a complimentary role. Later, in early 1980s the Shivarama Karanth film policy committee again recommended formation of Chalachitra Academy which was supported by the working Group of the Ministry with a blue print for implementation. For reasons best known to it, the Central Government never bothered to give due attention to it and it is left in the cold storage.
As on today, Kerala State has its Academy, West Bengal has NANDAN, a house of film culture and now Karnataka joins them with its objectives. Let us wish and hope it will achieve success in implementing its avowed objectives.
H. N Narahari Rao
Editor |
 |
|
| |
| Film Reviews |
Slumdog Millionaire A 2008 film of Danny Boyle (b. 1956)
Comments by Gaston Roberge, |
 |
|
If you’ve seen the movie and responded to it, perhaps a catch phrase of that movie could be addressed to you: “Is that your final answer?” Much of what has been written on the film suggests that many viewers should reconsider their response to it. |
|
| |
There are many good reasons why Slumdog Millionaire drew so much attention worldwide. The movie is entertaining, with a good story, good acting, interesting characters, arresting locations from the top of a moving train to the bottom of a pit toilet … and to the investigation room of a police headquarters; from the squalor of overcrowded slum areas to modern high rise buildings; from the Taj Mahal in Agra to a primary school in Mumbai. Above all, Slumdog Millionaire is meaningful. It inspires hope with a deep feeling of appreciation and even love for others.
What retains my attention is that SM is an astounding instance of the globalization of culture. The movie revolves around a television program, “Who wants to be a millionaire?” The name of the program is inspired by a 1956 song of Cole Porter in the film High Society (did we slide from high society to slums?). 1 The song emphasizes the desirability of love over material possessions: "Who wants to be a millionaire? I don't. ... And I don't 'cause all I want is you," says the song. 2 Is this not the attitude of Jamal regarding both money and Latika? As in the original song, in the film Latika shares Jamal’s attitude. In the High Society film, the lovers sing to each other: “all I want is you.” Could it be that Cole Porter, Vikas Swarup (on whose novel this movie is based) and Danny Boyle have mindlessly used the phrase “Who want to be a millionaire?” with the values it alludes to? Just because they are catchy? Surely not. Then what do we do with the movie? Do we ignore its meaning and focus our attention on trivia?
The television show originated in the UK in 1998. It fast became popular and a franchise was created. Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? is the most internationally popular television franchise of all time, having aired in over 100 countries. As of now no other franchise has ever reached this milestone. 3
The Indian game show “Kaun Banega Crorepati” ("Who wants to be a crorepati") based on “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?” first aired in 2005 on the Star Network throughout India and shared the same success as its foreign counterparts. After a brief stint in politics in the mid- 1980s, Amitabh Bachchan gained a new generation of fans as host of the television game show Kaun Banega Crorepati?
It is not surprising, therefore, that a film like Slumdog Millionaire has been made in India by British filmmakers. It shows how widely spread popular cultural themes are, and the rising importance of India on the world screen, and more importantly on the world scene. That India is not just an image, but a fact central to the world today was exemplified by the exhibition “Building India” held in Amsterdam from 14 November 2008 to 24 January 2009. The exhibition was organized by the Amsterdam Center for Architecture (ARCAM) and focused on five Indian cities: Ahmedabad, Delhi, Kollkata, Mumbai and Bangalore. In the journal brought out by ARCAM on the occasion of the exhibition, the following lines can be read: |
India is booming and the whole world is watching with bated breath. Since economic liberalization in 1991, the country has been experiencing phenomenal economic growth, as a result of which India is currently one of the world’s major economic powers. At the same time, however, the country clearly has huge problems. Its cities are expanding at an unprecedented rate, virtually without consistent urban plans, and are having to contend with inadequate facilities in the fields of infrastructure, sewerage and housing. (p.1) |
| |
Some viewers of the film may be irked by the fact that Jamal is suspected of cheating. Referring to an incident in the UK where an army officer was convicted of cheating in the television game, the author of the novel on which the film is based, Vikas Swarup, said:
"If a British army major can be accused of cheating, then an ignorant tiffin boy from the world's biggest slum can definitely be accused of cheating."4 Let me add: “With a difference: Jamal was not found guilty.”
The title “slumdog” is perhaps not felicitous, especially from the point of view of slumdwellers. The word ‘dog’ has so many meanings that in the case of the newly coined term “slumdog” one has to see from the context what might be the intended implications. If the hero, Jamal, who honestly becomes a multimillionaire, can be called a “slumdog”, then the expression is an implicit homage to whomever it is used for.
Unfortunately, too much attention, I submit, was given to the “image” of India projected by the movie. That sort of reaction is not new. Even Satyajit Ray was criticized because, some of his critics claimed, he projected the poverty of Indian villagers in his film Pather Panchali. Member of Parliament and movie star Nargis leveled that accusation against S. Ray, saying he was exporting Indian poverty. Yet, Pather Panchali was given a special award at the Cannes film festival of 1955 for its humane quality. Mother Teresa also was accused by some Indians residing outside India (NRIs) of ‘spoiling’ the image of Kolkata.
Indians are not the only ones to be concerned about the image of their countries. Some Italians objected to the image of the ‘mafia’ (although the word was not used in the movie) projected in the film The Godfather (1972), a film that is nonetheless considered as one of the best movies ever produced. Similarly, people from the Balkans have objected to the way their country was imagined in the Harry Potter novels and films.5
How other people see one’s country and what image of it they project has become a new branch of media studies, imagology.6 That image others have of one’s culture and country deserves to be studied. It is heartening that a book on how India is represented in foreign films throughout the history of cinema has been written by Mrs. Vijaya Mulay and is being published.
In fact, we in India should rejoice. Slumdog Millionaire projects a marvelous image of Indian slum dwellers. As noted above, the hero, Jamal, values love above money. His participation in the television game was for him a way to reestablish contact with Latika. He knew that Latika watched the show regularly. The film beautifully shows that the answers Jamal gave to the questions put to him in the television game were learnt by him from his life experience in the slum itself. The movie shows that slum life gives an experience worth millions. Jamal’s brother, Salim, indulged in criminal acts, yet, in prayer, he confessed to God that he had sinned. Moreover, at great risk to his own life, Salim saved Jamal from being blinded, and finally gave his life to help him be reunited to Latika.. The film also shows the extraordinary resilience of the young slum dwellers. At the beginning of the movie when the police chase kids playing on a landing track of the airport, these children take it as part of the game and one of them informs his companion that “the dogs” have come. Who then is a slumdog?
I welcome Slumdog Millionaire as a striking instance of the globalization of culture. In this case, the film reflects the phenomenon of global culture more than it effects it. However, I shall mention at least two other examples of globalized culture. They are the two movies Manasarovar and Amal. These two films demonstrate that all is not negative in globalization.
Manasarovar is an Indian film made in India, a film that has been received as a typical Indian film. Yet, an Irish band produced the music of the entire film. While, at least in my opinion, that music cannot be said to be Indian, it is so well integrated in the film that it enriches its Indian-ness.
The other example, Amal, is a Canadian film produced by a group of Indo-Canadians who went to Delhi to shoot their film. While this film too, like Monosarovar, is typically Indian, it was declared one of the ten best Canadian movies of 2007. The two films show that one can subsist harmoniously and fruitfully in a global world while retaining and developing one’s identity. Can we not say that Slumdog Millionaire is a British film that superbly depicts some aspects of Indian life, while illustrating the theme of a Unitedstatesian popular song? |
|
1 See and hear Celeste Holmes and Frank Sinatra singing “Who wants to be a millionaire” from High Society.
http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2008/08/26/cole-porter-who-wants-to-be-a-millionaire-1956/
2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Wants_To_Be_A_Millionaire%3F
3 http://www.answers.com/topic/who-wants-to-be-a-millionaire
4 http://www.answers.com/topic/who-wants-to-be-a-millionaire
5 See “Images of Albania and Albanians in English literature – from Edith Durham’s High Albania to J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter,” by Gëzim Alpion in his Encounters with Civilizations, Kolkata, Meteor Books in Association with St. Xavier’s College, 2008, Chapter 8.
6 Imagology: the cultural construction and literary representation of national characters. A critical survey edited by Manfred Beller and Joep Leerssen
http://cf.hum.uva.nl/images/dtory/flyer.pdf. See also Amazon. |
 |
|
| |
Dreams of Dust (Rêves de poussière)
(Burkina Faso / France / 35 mm / col / 85 mins)
Director: Laurent Salgues (Burkina Faso) |
 |
|
This is a film that should stand as a lesson for all art filmmaker in India for the vivid way in which it tackles the way of life it deals with. The film begins with a shot of an empty land which seems strangely craggy and full of small mounds. As we watch, a pair of hands and a face appear from |
|
behind one of the mounds. After the whole man emerges, as do others from behind other mounds, we gradually understand that there are holes behind the mounds of earth and these holes actually constitute a gold mine in which miserable workers toil day in and day out in the hope that the bags of earth they transport manually to the surface will contain enough traces of the precious metal to transform their lives.
The protagonist is Mocktar (played convincingly by Makena Diop). Mocktar is a refugee from the neighboring country Niger, a man not particularly striving for anything as much as escaping an unhappy past even though this escape means survival through hard struggle. Mocktar seeks employment in an Essakane mining camp, run by a greedy and cowardly overseer. The mines that he and his fellows work in are holes in the desert, dug straight down without supports or safety equipment. Miners are given flashlights that they strap to their heads for light and digging tools. All of Mocktar's co-workers are digging for tiny scraps of gold in order to survive but have dreams of a better life: marriage, education, wealth and hope. Mocktar befriends Coumba (Fatou Tall-Salgues) a young window & mother, attempting to raise her young daughter, amid the squalor and poverty of a mining camp. Coumba dreams of sending her small daughter away to Paris, to get an education and a better life.
|
| |
Most striking about Dreams of Dust is the way the film uses the landscape and brings to life a condition. Cinematographer Crystel Fournier and Salgues draw us into a cinematic hell, a fantastic and surreal world that is outside own experience but terrifyingly real. The camera also |
|
 |
|
takes in the faces of the characters as it does the landscape – not as actors playing roles but as real people living real lives.
It is easy to see why Dreams of Dust has been more celebrated across the world than any example from Indian art cinema in the past several decades. What the film does is to pay attention to an actual way of live and deal with actual people instead of trying to turn the information it contains into some kind of melodramatic fiction inhabited by overfed actors and actresses. The film approaches its subject matter with no preconceptions in mind on what moral position it should take - except that it should be for humanity.
One cannot believe that India, with all its diversity, its color and its capacity to startle cannot provide subjects for cinema of this quality. But to do this the Indian filmmaker should perhaps become more observant instead of only being preoccupied with the familiar ‘issues’ in the public realm. |
| |
| by MK Raghavendra |
 |
|
| |
Films Revisited
Carmen
(Spain / 1983 / Col / 102 mins)
Cast: Antonio Gades, Laura del Sol, Paco de Lucia, Marisol, Cristina Hoyos;
Production: Emiliano Piedra, Screenplay: Carlos Saura, Antonio Gades,
Cinematography: Teodoro Escamilla, Music: Paco de Lucia, Editing: Pedro del Rey.
Direction: Carlos Saura |
 |
|
Carmen is a film for those who love dance and music, particularly Flamenco Dance in its true form. The film is a fictional story beautifully told through dance rehearsals. There is no regular stage performance as such in a theatre with audience. But the rehearsals are so intelligently and pleasantly choreographed, it is simply |
|
enthralling. The music for the dances is very well tuned and it is highly entertaining to even for those who are alien to this type of music. The groups that perform the flamenco dance narrating the episodes have given their best performance. In one of the numbers a group of women singers sing a song for the dance to the beats of fingers on the table for a rhythm which is haunting. Though the film is inspired by the novel, the actual story that takes place on the screen is different, it revolves round the personal story of the performers told through dance and actual incidents. But the episodes that are rehearsed and some of the actual happenings are almost replica of the original. The rehearsal in which Carmen stabs Cristina, her rival is similar to one such instance and Carmen moving away from Antonio is another. It is coincidence that the dancer’s name is also Carmen. Sometimes it is quite confusing, particularly when Carmen’s husband Jose performs dance with Antonio after the poker game. More than the story that is narrated, it is the music and dance that gives an unforgettable entertainment for the viewers. It is a well documented work giving a good insight into the nuances of Spanish performing art.
This film is the second part of the trilogy that Carlos Saura has made on this subject of Choreography, the other two being Blood Wedding (1981) and El Amor Brujo (1986).
The film has won many international awards, including Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Language Film, Best European Film, Best Artistic Contribution and Technical Grand Prize at Cannes. The film is available on DVD. |
| |
| by H. N Narahari Rao |
 |
|
| |
| Book Review |
The most memorable Films of the World
H. N Narahari Rao |
 |
|
The Most Memorable Films of the World from the diaries of the film societies, a book written by H.N.Narahari Rao is now in its second edition. With 30 more films added in the new edition, in a separate chapter, the book now contains reviews with all details, of 160 films covering 50 countries. This publication is now released by Prism Books Bangalore. The book is quite successful in achieving its objective of serving as a reference volume for film students, film society activists, and film lovers.
Copies of the book priced at Rs.425/- are available at: |
|
Bangalore:
1865, 32nd cross, 10th Main,
BSK II Stage Bangalore -560070
Tel: 080- 26714108,
E-mail: prism@vsnl.com |
Chennai:
Ist Floor, New No. 2,
Old No. 33, 2nd Cross Street,
CIT Nagar West, Chennai-600035
Tel: 044- 42867308 / 4286 7509 |
| |
|
Hyderabad:
Parvathy Residency # 3-6-157/A,
Flat No. 101, Beside Urdeu Hall
Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad- 500029
Tel: 040-2326 1869 |
Kochi:
28/ 630 A, KP Vallavan Road,
Kadavanthra, Kochi-682020
Tel: 0484-400945, |
| |
|
Kolkata:
49, Sardar Sankar Road,
Kolkata – 700 029,
Tel: 033- 2463 3890 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
The Legends of India Cinema
Aruna Vasudev |
 |
|
Aruna Vasudev, well known film critic and writer is now busy with her work as Series Editor in publishing a series of books under the title: The Legends of India Cinema.
This is a very laudable effort since these books are monographs, covering the life and achievements of the great names of the Indian cinema and written by well known authors. With a high production value, these books, though brief in content, each book containing |
|
around 100 pages, are in a handy size and serve the purpose of giving much needed information on the legends of Indian cinema.
Sohrab Modi by Amrit Gangar,
P.C Barua by Shoma Chatterji
Mehboob Khan by Rauf Ahmed
Guru Dutt by Rashmi Doraiswamy
Sivaji Ganesan by Theodore Bhaskaran
Shammi Kapoor by Deepa Gahlot.
The Books are published by:
Wisdom Tree
4779/23 Ansari Road,
Darya Ganj, New Delhi -110002
Ph: 23247966 /67 /68 |
 |
|
|
|
|